100% correct, my friend. This is 100% illegal. If you do not want your neighbors to hear their phone calls and read e-mail, you do not want your government does dier.Onze founding fathers would turn in his grave right now!
For Eric “It’s not that we have nothing to hide, it is our right to be able to hide until the government has firm evidence that the importance of legal certainty.
It’s amazing how many of the same people who would like to see the constitutionality (or lack thereof) of gun control have no problem with domestic spying unconstitutional!
For a crime, you must have a victim. Name one person who had their rights taken by a satellite or a wire tap. Give me a victim and we can win in the Supreme Court. Because the Supreme Court has already ruled on dit.http: / / items. bbc. com/2008/feb/20/nation/na-scotus20Wat I ask is that you say it is a crime, or against the Constitution and the Supreme Court protects the Constitution and declared it legal.
The point is that it is unconstitutional. Period. I do not care if people say, ‘Well, if you do not commit crimes, what you fear. “The answer is… You should be afraid of a government that, while in power, you slowly removed every right to cherish every right and that this nation has taken to become a black gat.Zij Third world have no right to do what you really true, and it probably is. But the government, through our elected representatives, and we now refer to the Republicans, because they who forced down our throats, gets his way because people still totalitarian corporate criminals choose our politicians kantoren.En Then ask her how this can happen.
What do you have to hide? One answer, he said. Man should live under the rock. The point is that it makes no difference if you have something to hide or not, tapping against the law and a violation of privacy, in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. The first sign of tyranny, the confiscation of private firearms, second, and in some ways more insidious is the suspension of their right to privacy.
Never belived when no crime. It is unconstitutional the warrantless wiretapping. It enables the crane and then to obtain an injunction, but “off the faucet, is inadmissible in rechtbank.Ik read an interview of former chief judge of the FISA, issueing makers with wiretapping orders in cases of external surveillance and find the idea of the search warrant-less laughable. He said that in his time on the track, only a few monitoring not only ensures geweigerd.Dus without warrant illegal, stupid.
people who say, “What you have to hide” would make the founders of this country sick. There was a reason why they do things in the Constitution, and it was because I had something to hide.
Whoa Nelly, I am not a victim of foul names. I’m not name a person falsely accused. Until the Constitution is changed is an error. I realize we’re at war, I know they need different approaches to these bone heads fight, but it was not the question was?
Under current law (including the Patriot Act) and the policy is still bleeding is under the FISA, and ensures a continued need in the internal VS.Wat constitutes probable cause is always a vague term, even within the government rechtbanken.Extern never had to go through the court when the government bespioneren.De can not touch the phone without an order from a FISA judge, nothing has changed. While Bush may claim additional power, it was decided not to testen.Met courts more powers to the satellites, the government has always controlled the satellite transmissions. Only private communications within the U.S. bevel.In needed extreme violations of the order of national security may be a temporary exemption if lives are at immediate risk, or to consumers as highly confidential information getting into the wrong hands.
You see, I believe there is a time lezen.Nergens is said that a warrant for a search and seizure does not happen! This is a very unique idea. . . that is why he says. . . . . . And there are no guarantees. . . This is the argument amounts to saying that armed men are only allowed to have guns, because that is how the second amendment seems to be in writing. . . You are not taking into account dialect was geschreven.Je days to study! Read some old cases that interpreted. . . Police to this day has the right to search your vehicle if they feel that they have caused. . . confirmed by the Supreme Court since the day it was ratified the Fourth Amendment. . . STUDY!
Not all actions of public information from or about a person to obtain, constitute a search. Therefore, government action that leads to change of protection only when the information or evidence in question was obtained through a “search” within the meaning of the amendment. If no search is necessary is not justified.
What crime? Satellites can not see at home. . . . If the paparrazi have a constitutional right to sit in front of a house of celebrities and take pictures through the window the govt certainly has the right to the position of the satellite territory. Frankly, I do not know what people are so afraid of. . . . . There is little chance that the govt is a waste of precious resources to spy on people in their homes (a satellite moves in its orbit is reduced to life). . . Your property is only a search agent is done on foot and waving a gun is seen in
So when we were listening to Japanese radio signals, which had a search warrant? No bet. So make a better way to get people involved in the clandestine war against our virtual identification. Whoever we get an arrest warrant? Our enemies do not wear bright colors, and read a sign above his head to keep it. So if you have a clever way to tell who is friend and who is not, can you share us. Otherwise there are people of America to conserve and, unless you have bad intentions on jezelf.Toch I think it’s rather curious that those who do “with” their right to privacy, I can understand, usually are not compatible with the law to life, freedom of religion, the right to bare arms, freedom of expression. . . speech unless they agree met.U can not pick and choose the rights that you have the support moonbeam.
The big concern is that AT & T allowed the NSA to tap their network without fully toezicht.De reason this is a problem that can be used for political espionage. Nixon had to hire people to break into the party headquarters. The current government has already broken all the calls and Internet searches in the country.
July 11th, 2010 at 7:18 pm
What do you have to hide?
July 11th, 2010 at 7:29 pm
100% correct, my friend. This is 100% illegal. If you do not want your neighbors to hear their phone calls and read e-mail, you do not want your government does dier.Onze founding fathers would turn in his grave right now!
July 11th, 2010 at 8:12 pm
who have been subjected to unreasonable searches and seizures? No, what are you complaining?
July 11th, 2010 at 8:13 pm
For Eric “It’s not that we have nothing to hide, it is our right to be able to hide until the government has firm evidence that the importance of legal certainty.
July 11th, 2010 at 8:55 pm
It’s amazing how many of the same people who would like to see the constitutionality (or lack thereof) of gun control have no problem with domestic spying unconstitutional!
July 11th, 2010 at 9:23 pm
For a crime, you must have a victim. Name one person who had their rights taken by a satellite or a wire tap. Give me a victim and we can win in the Supreme Court. Because the Supreme Court has already ruled on dit.http: / / items. bbc. com/2008/feb/20/nation/na-scotus20Wat I ask is that you say it is a crime, or against the Constitution and the Supreme Court protects the Constitution and declared it legal.
July 11th, 2010 at 9:43 pm
The point is that it is unconstitutional. Period. I do not care if people say, ‘Well, if you do not commit crimes, what you fear. “The answer is… You should be afraid of a government that, while in power, you slowly removed every right to cherish every right and that this nation has taken to become a black gat.Zij Third world have no right to do what you really true, and it probably is. But the government, through our elected representatives, and we now refer to the Republicans, because they who forced down our throats, gets his way because people still totalitarian corporate criminals choose our politicians kantoren.En Then ask her how this can happen.
July 11th, 2010 at 10:38 pm
What do you have to hide? One answer, he said. Man should live under the rock. The point is that it makes no difference if you have something to hide or not, tapping against the law and a violation of privacy, in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. The first sign of tyranny, the confiscation of private firearms, second, and in some ways more insidious is the suspension of their right to privacy.
July 11th, 2010 at 11:16 pm
Never belived when no crime. It is unconstitutional the warrantless wiretapping. It enables the crane and then to obtain an injunction, but “off the faucet, is inadmissible in rechtbank.Ik read an interview of former chief judge of the FISA, issueing makers with wiretapping orders in cases of external surveillance and find the idea of the search warrant-less laughable. He said that in his time on the track, only a few monitoring not only ensures geweigerd.Dus without warrant illegal, stupid.
July 11th, 2010 at 11:41 pm
people who say, “What you have to hide” would make the founders of this country sick. There was a reason why they do things in the Constitution, and it was because I had something to hide.
July 12th, 2010 at 12:20 am
Whoa Nelly, I am not a victim of foul names. I’m not name a person falsely accused. Until the Constitution is changed is an error. I realize we’re at war, I know they need different approaches to these bone heads fight, but it was not the question was?
July 12th, 2010 at 12:27 am
Under current law (including the Patriot Act) and the policy is still bleeding is under the FISA, and ensures a continued need in the internal VS.Wat constitutes probable cause is always a vague term, even within the government rechtbanken.Extern never had to go through the court when the government bespioneren.De can not touch the phone without an order from a FISA judge, nothing has changed. While Bush may claim additional power, it was decided not to testen.Met courts more powers to the satellites, the government has always controlled the satellite transmissions. Only private communications within the U.S. bevel.In needed extreme violations of the order of national security may be a temporary exemption if lives are at immediate risk, or to consumers as highly confidential information getting into the wrong hands.
July 12th, 2010 at 12:50 am
You see, I believe there is a time lezen.Nergens is said that a warrant for a search and seizure does not happen! This is a very unique idea. . . that is why he says. . . . . . And there are no guarantees. . . This is the argument amounts to saying that armed men are only allowed to have guns, because that is how the second amendment seems to be in writing. . . You are not taking into account dialect was geschreven.Je days to study! Read some old cases that interpreted. . . Police to this day has the right to search your vehicle if they feel that they have caused. . . confirmed by the Supreme Court since the day it was ratified the Fourth Amendment. . . STUDY!
July 12th, 2010 at 1:20 am
Not all actions of public information from or about a person to obtain, constitute a search. Therefore, government action that leads to change of protection only when the information or evidence in question was obtained through a “search” within the meaning of the amendment. If no search is necessary is not justified.
July 12th, 2010 at 2:11 am
What crime? Satellites can not see at home. . . . If the paparrazi have a constitutional right to sit in front of a house of celebrities and take pictures through the window the govt certainly has the right to the position of the satellite territory. Frankly, I do not know what people are so afraid of. . . . . There is little chance that the govt is a waste of precious resources to spy on people in their homes (a satellite moves in its orbit is reduced to life). . . Your property is only a search agent is done on foot and waving a gun is seen in
July 12th, 2010 at 3:08 am
So when we were listening to Japanese radio signals, which had a search warrant? No bet. So make a better way to get people involved in the clandestine war against our virtual identification. Whoever we get an arrest warrant? Our enemies do not wear bright colors, and read a sign above his head to keep it. So if you have a clever way to tell who is friend and who is not, can you share us. Otherwise there are people of America to conserve and, unless you have bad intentions on jezelf.Toch I think it’s rather curious that those who do “with” their right to privacy, I can understand, usually are not compatible with the law to life, freedom of religion, the right to bare arms, freedom of expression. . . speech unless they agree met.U can not pick and choose the rights that you have the support moonbeam.
July 12th, 2010 at 3:28 am
The big concern is that AT & T allowed the NSA to tap their network without fully toezicht.De reason this is a problem that can be used for political espionage. Nixon had to hire people to break into the party headquarters. The current government has already broken all the calls and Internet searches in the country.